Public service commission of Wisconsin, Theodore Kronshage, jr., individually and as a commissioner of said Public service commission of Wisconsin, et al, etc., appellants, vs. Wisconsin telephone company, appellee ...

Public service commission of Wisconsin, Theodore Kronshage, jr., individually and as a commissioner of said Public service commission of Wisconsin, et al, etc., appellants, vs. Wisconsin telephone company, appellee ... | 1933

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

Public service commission of Wisconsin, Theodore Kronshage, jr., individually and as a commissioner of said Public service commission of Wisconsin, et al, etc., appellants, vs. Wisconsin telephone company ...

Public service commission of Wisconsin, Theodore Kronshage, jr., individually and as a commissioner of said Public service commission of Wisconsin, et al, etc., appellants, vs. Wisconsin telephone company ... | 1932

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

City of Fort Smith, Arkansas; Fagan Bourland, as mayor of said city; M.J. Miller, et al., appellants, vs. Southwestern Bell telephone company, appellee

City of Fort Smith, Arkansas; Fagan Bourland, as mayor of said city; M.J. Miller, et al., appellants, vs. Southwestern Bell telephone company, appellee | 1925

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

Charles Keller, et al., constituting the Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, appellants, vs. Potomac electric power company, appellee

Charles Keller, et al., constituting the Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, appellants, vs. Potomac electric power company, appellee | 1922

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

Charles Keller, Cuno H. Rudolph, and James F. Oyster, consituting the Board of Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, appellants, vs. Potomac electric power company. Appeal from the court of appeals of the District of Columbia. Filed January 26, 1922. (28,673)

Charles Keller, Cuno H. Rudolph, and James F. Oyster, consituting the Board of Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, appellants, vs. Potomac electric power company. Appeal from the court of appeals of the District of Columbia. Filed January 26, 1922. (28,673) | 1922

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

The City of Houston, appellant, vs. Southwestern bell telephone company, appellee

The City of Houston, appellant, vs. Southwestern bell telephone company, appellee | 1921

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

The Northern securities company, the Great Northern railway company, the Northern Pacific railway company, James J. Hill [and others] appellants, vs. the United States

The Northern securities company, the Great Northern railway company, the Northern Pacific railway company, James J. Hill [and others] appellants, vs. the United States | 1903

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

The Bate refrigerating company, appellant, vs. Ferdinand Sulzberger, Samuel Weil, and Frederick Joseph

The Bate refrigerating company, appellant, vs. Ferdinand Sulzberger, Samuel Weil, and Frederick Joseph | 1894

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

[The Bate refrigerating company, appellant, vs. George H. Hammond & co

[The Bate refrigerating company, appellant, vs. George H. Hammond & co | 1888

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy railroad company, appellants, vs. Samuel H. Turrill

The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy railroad company, appellants, vs. Samuel H. Turrill | 1876

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

Henry B. Miller et al., collectors, appellants, v. M.K. Jesup et al., appellees

Henry B. Miller et al., collectors, appellants, v. M.K. Jesup et al., appellees | 1876

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

Henry B. Miller et al., collectors, appellants, vs. M.K. Jesup et al., appellees

Henry B. Miller et al., collectors, appellants, vs. M.K. Jesup et al., appellees | 1876

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

The Chicago and Alton railroad company, appellant, vs. Samuel H. Turrill

The Chicago and Alton railroad company, appellant, vs. Samuel H. Turrill | 1876

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

Henry B. Miller, and others, county cllectors [!], appellants, vs. Morris K. Jessup [i.e., Jesup], John Paton, D.A. Lindley and E.K. Goodnow, appellees

Henry B. Miller, and others, county cllectors [!], appellants, vs. Morris K. Jessup [i.e., Jesup], John Paton, D.A. Lindley and E.K. Goodnow, appellees | 1876

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

N.A. Cowdrey et al., appellants, vs. the Galveston, Houston and Henderson railroad company et al

N.A. Cowdrey et al., appellants, vs. the Galveston, Houston and Henderson railroad company et al | 1876

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

The state of Texas against George W. White, John Chiles, John A. Hardenberg, and others

The state of Texas against George W. White, John Chiles, John A. Hardenberg, and others | 1869

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

The Galveston, Houston and Henderson railroad company et al., appellants, vs. N.A. Cowdrey et al

The Galveston, Houston and Henderson railroad company et al., appellants, vs. N.A. Cowdrey et al | 1869

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

F.P. James et al., vs. Milwaukee and Minnesota railroad company et al

F.P. James et al., vs. Milwaukee and Minnesota railroad company et al | 1867

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

Frederick P. James, Abram M. Brewer, E. Bradford Grenleaf, Philip S. Justice, Elkanah Cobb, John V. Bean, Philip Wilson, and J. Howard Mitchell, appellants, vs. the Milwaukee and Minnesota railroad company

Frederick P. James, Abram M. Brewer, E. Bradford Grenleaf, Philip S. Justice, Elkanah Cobb, John V. Bean, Philip Wilson, and J. Howard Mitchell, appellants, vs. the Milwaukee and Minnesota railroad company | 1865

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.

Opinions of the judges

Opinions of the judges | 1837

Representative edition for this work grouping in the active catalog.