Responsoria ad Erratica Piscatoris. Or, A Caveat for Old and New Prophanenesse. By way of Reply to Two over-confident Pamphlets; The one called a Caveat for Old and New Sabbatarians, Published by Edward Fisher, Esq. The other called Festorum Metropolis, Published by an unknowne Author. In which Answer, The severall opinions of Epiphanius, Syslyga, Beroaldus, Scaliger, Sethus Calvisius, &c. for the Day of Christs birth, are propounded and examined, and it is fully proved, that the direct day cannot be determined. The Question also, Concerning the observation of Christmas-day, is debated, and it is fully proved, that it is not grounded on Scrip- ture, nor can the observation of it be proved for 360 years after Christ. Mr Fishers proof also from Clement

Work detail

Bookitis Pick

Responsoria ad Erratica Piscatoris. Or, A Caveat for Old and New Prophaneness...

John Collinges1 editions

This page groups all known editions belonging to the same underlying work.

Search books Open lead author

Overview

Shared work-level identity and catalog context.

1 credited authorSearch language english

Bookitis keeps work pages focused on the shared book identity and the editions that actually belong to it. Unrelated books should not appear here as primary content.

Contributors

People credited with this work in the active catalog.

John Collinges
Author profile in the active Bookitis catalog
Open Author

Editions

Publication-specific versions linked to this work only.

Responsoria ad Erratica Piscato...John Collinges
RA
Responsoria ad Erratica Piscatoris. Or, A Caveat for Old and New Prophanenesse. By way of Reply to Two over-confident Pamphlets; The one called a Caveat for Old and New Sabbatarians, Published by Edward Fisher, Esq. The other called Festorum Metropolis, Published by an unknowne Author. In which Answer, The severall opinions of Epiphanius, Syslyga, Beroaldus, Scaliger, Sethus Calvisius, &c. for the Day of Christs birth, are propounded and examined, and it is fully proved, that the direct day cannot be determined. The Question also, Concerning the observation of Christmas-day, is debated, and it is fully proved, that it is not grounded on Scrip- ture, nor can the observation of it be proved for 360 years after Christ. Mr Fishers proof also from Clement
John Collinges | 1653
1 views