Join BookitisSave favorites, build lists, and follow creators.

Junk Film

Why Bad Movies Matter

Bookitis Pick
Cover for Junk Film
JF
Image source: Open Library
Katharine Coldiron1 editions

WELCOME TO JUNK FILM Entire libraries of criticism study good art. Who studies bad art? For the most part, bad movies have been buried by their creators, or have circulated in midnight screenings and Reddit threads. They've been used for humor by Mystery Science Theater 3000 and Red Letter Media, and presented as outrageous spectacle by critics and commentators. Rarely have bad movies been studied. Junk Film's thirteen essays explore the failures of specific works created between the 1940s and the 2010s. Each demonstrates a different kind of failure, from mixing incompatible genres (*Cop Rock*) to stacking a screenplay with sociopaths (*Staying Alive*). The book uses a few basic theses about bad film and television to unpack these failures. Importantly, it shows what students of film can learn from bad movies: how to make art that works via watching art that doesn't. Junk Film bridges film scholarship and pop culture criticism with wit and warmth.

Overview

Shared work-level identity and catalog context.

1 credited authorSearch language english

Bookitis keeps work pages focused on the shared book identity and the editions that actually belong to it. Unrelated books should not appear here as primary content.

Contributors

People credited with this work in the active catalog.

  • Katharine Coldiron

    Author profile in the active Bookitis catalog

    Open Author

Editions

Publication-specific versions linked to this work only.