Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings And Constitutional Change
Work detail
"Before Supreme Court nominees are allowed take their place on the high Court, they must face a moment of democratic reckoning by appearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Despite the potential this holds for public input into the direction of legal change, the hearings are routinely derided as nothing but empty rituals and political grandstanding. In this book, Paul M. Collins, Jr., and Lori A. Ringhand present a contrarian view that uses both empirical data and stories culled from more than seventy years of transcripts to demonstrate that the hearings are a democratic forum for the discussion and ratification of constitutional change. As such, they are one of the ways in which "We the People" take ownership of the Constitution by examining the core constitutional values of those permitted to interpret it on our behalf."--Publisher's website.
Overview
Shared work-level identity and catalog context.
Contributors
People credited with this work in the active catalog.
- Open Author
Paul M. Collins
- Open Author
Lori A. Ringhand
Editions
Publication-specific versions linked to this work only.
- Image source: Open LibrarySC
Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings And Constitutional Change
- SCSupreme Court Confirmation Hear...Paul M. Collins, Lori A. Ringhand
Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change
- SCSupreme Court Confirmation Hear...Paul M. Collins, Lori A. Ringhand
Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change
- SCSupreme Court Confirmation Hear...Paul M. Collins, Lori A. Ringhand
Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change
- SCSupreme Court Confirmation Hear...Paul M. Collins, Lori A. Ringhand
Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change