Sister states, enemy states
Work detail
"When the Civil War erupted, Tennessee chose to secede while Kentucky remained part of the Union. The residents of Kentucky and Tennessee felt the full impact of the fighting as warring armies crossed back and forth across their borders. Due to Kentucky's strategic location, both the Union and the Confederacy sought to control it throughout the war, while Tennessee was second only to Virginia in the number of battles fought on its soil. Additionally, loyalties in each state were closely divided between the Union and the Confederacy, making wartime governance -- and personal relationships -- complex ... [the] editors ... explore how the war affected these two crucial states, and how they helped change the course of the war"--Flyleaf.
Overview
Shared work-level identity and catalog context.
Contributors
People credited with this work in the active catalog.
- Open Author
Kent T. Dollar
- Open Author
W. Calvin Dickinson
- Open Author
Larry H. Whiteaker
- Open Author
Michael R. Bradley
- Open Author
Kent Dollar
- Open Author
Larry Whiteaker
- Open Author
Jonathan M. Atkins
Editions
Publication-specific versions linked to this work only.
- SSSister States, Enemy StatesKent Dollar, Larry Whiteaker, W. Calvin Dickinson, Jonathan M. Atkins, Michael R. Bradley
Sister States, Enemy States
- SSSister States, Enemy StatesKent Dollar, Larry Whiteaker, W. Calvin Dickinson, Jonathan M. Atkins, Michael R. Bradley
Sister States, Enemy States
- SSSister States, Enemy StatesKent Dollar, W. Calvin Dickinson, Larry Whiteaker, Jonathan M. Atkins, Michael R. Bradley
Sister States, Enemy States
- SSSister states, enemy states
Sister states, enemy states